黄色在线观看视频-黄色在线免费看-黄色在线视频免费-黄色在线视频免费看-免费啪啪网-免费啪啪网站

首頁 - 網校 - 萬題庫 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 導航

2014年6月英語四級考前模擬沖刺題及答案解析(3)

來源:考試吧 2014-06-06 9:58:04 要考試,上考試吧! 英語四六級萬題庫
“2014年6月英語四級考前模擬沖刺題及答案解析”提供給各位考生沖洗備考,預祝大家取得好成績!

  Section B Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.47  47-56

  A.It’s hardly breaking news that junk food is bad for us.But just how bad—and just how much food companies know about the addictive(添加劑) components of certain foods,and just how much they deliberately target the most vulnerable consumers knowing they are doing damage-is still being discovered.The New York Times offers the latest installment in this weekend’s magazine with an article about the science of junk food addiction.

  B.Nearly everything written about food in the mainstream media relies on the san2e narrative:Obesity is bad.That kind of reporting is part of what’s keeping us sick.There’s no denying the fact that the American public has gotten larger in recent decades.Along with getting fatter,we've also seen a rise in illnesses like.heart disease and certain cancers.Instead of focusing on how our health is hurting.most of the media coverage uses the term “obesity”.making the story more about weight than about health—to the point where it’s become an accepted truth that“fat”equals “unheaithy”.

  C.That’s not actually the case.though.While “the obesity epidemic” may be a convenient catch.all for the illnesses and health problems related to our food chain.it’s a lazy term and an inaccurate one.Are we actually worried about public health? 0r are we offended by fat bodies that don’t meet our thin ideals?In all seriousness:what good does a focus on body size actually do?

  D.If we’re actually concerned about health.then we should focus on health.The addictive qualities of our food, the lack of oversight ( 監督). the high levels of chemicals and the government subsidies (補貼) to make prices lower making the worst foods the most accessible should concern us and spur us to action. Nutrient-deficient (營養缺乏) chemically-processed "food" in increasingly larger sizes is bad for all of our bodies, whether we're fat or thin or somewhere in between. So is the culture in which fast food is able to thrive. Americans work more than ever before; we take fewer vacation days and put in longer hours, especially since the recession hit. The US remains the only industrialized country without national paid parental leave and without compulsory annual vacation time; we also have no federal law requiring paid sick days. 85% of American men and 66% of women work more than 40 hours per week. In Norway, for comparison, 23% of men work more than 40-hour weeks, and only 7% of women.

  E.Despite all this work, American income levels remain remarkably divided into the poorest and the richest, with the richest few controlling nearly all of the wealth. In one of the wealthiest countries on earth, one in seven people rely on federal food aid, with most of the financial benefits going to big food companies who are also able to produce cheap, nutritionally questionable food thanks to agricultural subsidies. The prices of the worst foods are arificially depressed, the big food lobbies have enormous power, and the biggest loser is the American public, especially low-income folks wbo spend larger proportions of their income on food but face systematic impediments (妨礙) to healthy eating and exercise.

  F.With demanding work days, little time off and disproportionate amounts of our incomes going toward things like health insurance and childcare that other countries provide at a lower cost, is it any surprise that we eat fast-food breakfast on our laps in the car and prefer dinner options that are quick and cheap?

  G. Reforming our food system requires major structural changes, not just saying no to put down that bag of chips. We need to push back against corporate interests. Food companies are incredibly" good at positing themselves as crusaders (擁護者) for personal choice and entities simply dedicated to giving the public what it wants. Somehow, big food companies have convinced us that drinking a 32oz soda is a matter of personal liberty, and that the government has no place in regulating how much liquid sugar can be sold in a single container.

  H.In fact, we know-and they certainly know-that human beings are remarkably bad at judging how much we're eating. Food companies use that information to encourage over-consumption, and to target certain consumers who tend to have less disposable income to invest in healthy food poor people, people of color, kids.

  I. Food is a social justice issue that has disproportionately negative impacts on groups already facing hardship. That should be an issue for every socially conscious person. But when looking at the large number of problems caused not only by our big food industry but by the policies that enable them and our cultural norms that incentivize poor health choices, too many people simply turn "obesity" into the boogeyman(惡巫) . Doctors even blame fatness for all sorts of medical conditions and people don't get proper treatment. Fat women go to the doctor less often for routine cancer screenings, and patients report doctors focusing on their weight and ignoring real medical problems like broken bones and asthma (哮喘).

  J.On the policy side, promoters of laws that incentivize health or push back on corporate food interests such as Michelle Obarna's Let's Move ! initiative, bans on extra-large sodas, and extra SNAP benefits at farmer's markets inevitably target " obesity" in their campaigns. That strategy has the effect of maligning (誹謗) the beauty of certain bodies instead of encouraging everyone to be healthier and countering the enormous influence of big companies. As a result, many people who should be the natural allies of health-promoting initiatives are put off by the shaming fat language.

  K."Obesity epidemic" language has also fed into the idea of body size and eating habits as social group. Thinner kale (甘藍) eating elite liberals in the Northeast are trying to force-feed cabbage to heavier real Americans in the South and Midwest. No one wins with that kind of cultural polarization.

  L.Yes, let's push back against big food companies and question their outsized influence in Washington and in our daffy lives, and let's focus on making healthy food more widely accessible. Let's realize that the challenges extend beyond just what we eat. Let's fight for the humane (仁愛的) work policies that will make us all healthier.

  M.But let's do that because public health is all of our concern, not because it's culturally easy to point the finger at fat people. Giving every member of a society the chance to be as healthy as possible is a moral good. It saves money and it saves lives. So let's do it the right way and the most effective way without lazily relying on the word "obesity".

  As a social justice problem, food negatively impact on groups who already have had a difficult life.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:I:

  

  

  

  48The word "obesity" used by most media coverage shows they concern less about our health than our weight.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:B:

  

  

  49We should concentrate on making people have more access to get healthy food.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:L:

  

  

  50In one of the wealthiest countries in the world, one in seven Americans live on federal food aid.本題共8.3分,參考答案:E:

  

  51Among the industrialized countries, the US is the only one having no national paid parental leave and sick days, and compulsory annual vacation time.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:D:

  

  

  52The same idea about food in the mainstream media is that, obesity is bad.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:B:

  

  

  53The term "obesity epidemic" has promoted the idea of body size and eating habits as social group.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:K:

  

  

  54To make structural changes of our food system, we need to fight against food companies' interests.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:G:

  

  55It is the government subsidies to lower the prices of food that make the worst foods the most obtainable.

  本題共8.3分,參考答案:D:

  

  

  56It is a moral good to offer eyery one in the society the opportunity to be as healthy as they could.本題共8.3分,參考答案:M:

  

  

 

上一頁  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下一頁

  相關推薦:

  2014年6月大學英語四級翻譯高分秘笈

  關注考試吧四六級微信 第一時間對答案 看解析

  2014年6月英語四六級考試真題及答案解析專題熱點文章

 

0
收藏該文章
0
收藏該文章
文章搜索
萬題庫小程序
萬題庫小程序
·章節視頻 ·章節練習
·免費真題 ·?荚囶}
微信掃碼,立即獲!
掃碼免費使用
英語四級
共計423課時
講義已上傳
30206人在學
英語六級
共計313課時
講義已上傳
20312人在學
閱讀理解
共計687課時
講義已上傳
5277人在學
完形填空
共計369課時
講義已上傳
13161人在學
作文
共計581課時
講義已上傳
7187人在學
推薦使用萬題庫APP學習
掃一掃,下載萬題庫
手機學習,復習效率提升50%!
版權聲明:如果英語四六級考試網所轉載內容不慎侵犯了您的權益,請與我們聯系800@exam8.com,我們將會及時處理。如轉載本英語四六級考試網內容,請注明出處。
Copyright © 2004- 考試吧英語四六級考試網 出版物經營許可證新出發京批字第直170033號 
京ICP證060677 京ICP備05005269號 中國科學院研究生院權威支持(北京)
精選6套卷
8次直播課
大數據寶典
通關大法!
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美日韩aa一级视频 | 1717she永久精品免费 | 成年网站免费观看 | 久久精品波多野结衣 | 91视频一88av | 亚洲免费黄色 | 男女做羞羞的网站视频 | 一区二区影院 | videoshd4k欧美激情 | 一级毛片视频在线观看 | 丝袜综合网 | 免费观看成人毛片 | 一级欧美日韩 | 国产黄色毛片 | www.日韩视频 | 毛片动态图 | 中文字幕日本在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲高清 | 欧美日韩在线播放 | aaa一级特黄 | 天天草草 | 高清欧美一级在线观看 | 日韩美a一级毛片 | 成人精品一区二区三区 | 日韩毛片在线 | 国产精品亚洲欧美日韩一区在线 | 成人www视频网站免费观看 | 大黄网站免费 | 欧美成人免费全部观看在线看 | 欧美影院一区二区三区 | 天天噜噜色| 日日天干夜夜人人添 | 日本久色 | 国产高清视频青青青在线 | 337p日本大胆欧洲色噜噜高清 | 国产精品欧美亚洲韩国日本久久 | a级男女性高爱潮高清试 | 本道在线观看 | aⅴ一区二区三区无卡无码 aⅴ在线免费观看 | 成人黄网18免费观看的网站 | 人人爽视频 |