黄色在线观看视频-黄色在线免费看-黄色在线视频免费-黄色在线视频免费看-免费啪啪网-免费啪啪网站

首頁 - 網校 - 萬題庫 - 美好明天 - 直播 - 導航

2019年6月英語六級閱讀理解全真模擬題(14)

來源:考試吧 2019-4-12 9:49:43 要考試,上考試吧! 英語四六級萬題庫
考試吧整理“2019年6月英語六級閱讀理解全真模擬題(14)”,更多關于英語六級考試模擬試題,請訪問考試吧英語四六級考試網。

  點擊查看:2019年6月六級閱讀理解模擬題匯總

  英語六級閱讀理解全真模擬題(14)

  A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid ) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to identify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses.

  DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to trove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect.

  The controversy in 1998 stemmed form a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., and Daniel L. Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method cannot properly determine the likelihood that two DNA samples will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate.

  In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K.Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998, however, the federal Bureau of Investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples form various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And, in April, a National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation for DNA testing laboratories.

  1.Before DNA fingerprinting is used, suspects____.

  A.would have to leave their fingerprints for further investigations

  B.would have to submit evidence for their innocence

  C.could easily escape conviction of guilt

  D.cold be convicted of guilt as well

  2.DNA fingerprinting can be unreliable when ____.

  A.the methods used for blood- cell calculation are not accurate

  B.two different individuals of the same ethnic group may have the same DNA fingerprinting pattern

  C.a match is by chance left with fingerprints that happen to belong to two different individuals

  D.two different individuals leave two DNA samples.

  3.To geneticists like Lewontin and Hartl, the current method ____.

  A.is not so convincing as to exclude the likelihood that two DNA samples can never come from two individuals

  B.is arguable because two individuals of the same ethnic group are likely to have the same DNA pattern.

  C.Is not based on adequate scientific theory of genetics

  D.Is theoretically contradictory to what they have been studying

  4.The attitude of the Federal Bereau of Investigation shows that ____.

  A.enough data are yet to be collected form various ethnic groups to confirm the unlikelihood of two DNA samples coming from two individual members

  B.enough data of DNA samples should be collected to confirm that only DNA samples form the same person can match

  C.enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to determine the likelihood of two different DNA samples coming form the same person

  D.additional samples from various ethnic groups should be collected to determine that two DNA samples are unlikely to come from the same person

  5.National Academy of Sciences holds the stance that ____.

  A.DNA testing should be systematized

  B.Only authorized laboratories can conduct DNA testing

  C.The academy only is authorized to work out standards for testing

  D.The academy has the right to accredit laboratories for DNA testing

  第十四篇答案:CBABB

掃描/長按二維碼可幫助通過46級考試
獲取四六級報名時間
獲取四六級通關技巧
獲取精選四六級試題
獲取作文聽力等資料

四六級萬題庫 | 微信搜索"萬題庫英語四六級考試"

  編輯推薦:

  2019年6月大學英語六級詞匯看圖記憶匯總

  2019年英語六級作文 | 2019年英語六級詞匯

  2019年英語六級聽力 | 2019年英語六級翻譯

  1995-2019英語六級作文真題及參考范文匯總

  歷年大學英語六級考試真題聽力(含MP3)匯總

  歷年大學英語六級考試真題及答案解析匯總

  2019年英語四六級考試時間已確定(筆試+口語)

0
收藏該文章
0
收藏該文章
文章責編:zhangyuqiong  
看了本文的網友還看了
文章搜索
萬題庫小程序
萬題庫小程序
·章節視頻 ·章節練習
·免費真題 ·模考試題
微信掃碼,立即獲取!
掃碼免費使用
英語四級
共計423課時
講義已上傳
30206人在學
英語六級
共計313課時
講義已上傳
20312人在學
閱讀理解
共計687課時
講義已上傳
5277人在學
完形填空
共計369課時
講義已上傳
13161人在學
作文
共計581課時
講義已上傳
7187人在學
推薦使用萬題庫APP學習
掃一掃,下載萬題庫
手機學習,復習效率提升50%!
版權聲明:如果英語四六級考試網所轉載內容不慎侵犯了您的權益,請與我們聯系800@exam8.com,我們將會及時處理。如轉載本英語四六級考試網內容,請注明出處。
精選6套卷
8次直播課
大數據寶典
通關大法!
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美国产在线观看 | 精品亚洲欧美高清不卡高清 | 最近播放的好看hd | 看看的在线视频国产 | 欧美aaa级片| 天天草草| 天堂网视频| a视频在线免费观看 | 2021入口一二三四麻豆 | 午夜爽爽性刺激一区二区视频 | 亚洲天堂在线观看视频 | 欧美日韩国产超高清免费看片 | 日韩中文字幕在线视频 | 日韩免费不卡视频 | 国产一级毛片午夜福 | 日本福利网站 | 成人免费观看男女羞羞视频 | 亚洲成人观看 | 奇米影视一区二区三区 | 亚洲无线观看 | 丝袜美臀综合图 | 在线观看免费视频a | 18av在线视频 | 亚洲欧美中日韩中文字幕 | 日本全身露裸无遮挡黄漫画 | 成人深夜视频在线观看 | 久青草国产97香蕉在线视频xx | 草草线在成人免费视频 | 欧美精品videosex极品 | 国产黄色大片又色又爽 | 欧美日韩一本大道香蕉欧美 | 一级黄色片在线观看 | 中文字幕天天躁日日躁狠狠 | 香港午夜三级a三级高清观看 | 亚洲黄色三级 | 欲漫涩漫画禁漫成人入口 | 一个人看的www高清在线观看 | 青青草国产精品视频 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线a乱码 | 日韩免费高清视频网站 | 最近2019中文字幕 |