Text 4

　　Bankers have been blaming themselves for their troubles in public. Behind the scenes, they have been taking aim at someone else: the accounting standard-setters. Their rules, moan the banks, have forced them to report enormous losses, and it’s just not fair. These rules say they must value some assets at the price a third party would pay, not the price managers and regulators would like them to fetch.

　　Unfortunately, banks’ lobbying now seems to be working. The details may be unknowable, but the independence of standard-setters, essential to the proper functioning of capital markets, is being compromised. And, unless banks carry toxic assets at prices that attract buyers, reviving the banking system will be difficult.

　　After a bruising encounter with Congress, America’s Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) rushed through rule changes. These gave banks more freedom to use models to value illiquid assets and more flexibility in recognizing losses on long-term assets in their income statement. Bob Herz, the FASB’s chairman, cried out against those who “question our motives.” Yet bank shares rose and the changes enhance what one lobby group politely calls “the use of judgment by management.”

　　European ministers instantly demanded that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) do likewise. The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning, but the pressure to fold when it completes its reconstruction of rules later this year is strong. Charlie McCreevy, a European commissioner, warned the IASB that it did “not live in a political vacuum” but “in the real world” and that Europe could yet develop different rules.

　　It was banks that were on the wrong planet, with accounts that vastly overvalued assets. Today they argue that market prices overstate losses, because they largely reflect the temporary illiquidity of markets, not the likely extent of bad debts. The truth will not be known for years. But bank’s shares trade below their book value, suggesting that investors are skeptical. And dead markets partly reflect the paralysis of banks which will not sell assets for fear of booking losses, yet are reluctant to buy all those supposed bargains.

　　To get the system working again, losses must be recognized and dealt with. America’s new plan to buy up toxic assets will not work unless banks mark assets to levels which buyers find attractive. Successful markets require independent and even combative standard-setters. The FASB and IASB have been exactly that, cleaning up rules on stock options and pensions, for example, against hostility from special interests. But by giving in to critics now they are inviting pressure to make more concessions.

　　36. Bankers complained that they were forced to

　　[A] follow unfavorable asset evaluation rules

　　[B]collect payments from third parties

　　[C]cooperate with the price managers

　　[D]reevaluate some of their assets.

　　選A. 細節題。定位在文章首段后兩句話。

　　37.According to the author , the rule changes of the FASB may result in

　　[A]the diminishing role of management

　　[B]the revival of the banking system

　　[C]the banks’ long-term asset losses

　　[D]the weakening of its independence

　　選A. 推理題。解題線索為第三段，句首提到，FASB經過努力使國會通過了一些變革，這些變革賦予了銀行更多的權利，因此A“管理作用逐漸消失”符合題意。

　　38.According to Paragraph 4, McCreevy objects to the IASB’s attempt to

　　[A]keep away from political influences.

　　[B]evade the pressure from their peers.

　　[C]act on their own in rule-setting.

　　[D]take gradual measures in reform.

　　選 D. 細節題。解題線索在文章第五段，段首表示“歐洲部長們都希望IASB也進行改革”，同時在段位，“The IASB says it does not want to act without overall planning”，表示IASB不希望草率行事，但是在段位McCreevy表示“Europe could yet develop different rules”，因此McCreevy反對的應該是IASB緩慢的改革步伐，因此D符合文意。

　　39.The author thinks the banks were “on the wrong planet ”in that they

　　[A]misinterpreted market price indicators

　　[B]exaggerated the real value of their assets

　　[C]neglected the likely existence of bad debts.

　　[D]denied booking losses in their sale of assets.

　　選C. 細節題。解題線索第五段，忽視了“the likely extent of bad debts”。

　　40.The author’s attitude towards standard-setters is one of

　　[A]satisfaction.

　　[B]skepticism.

　　[C]objectiveness

　　[D]sympathy

　　選D. 情感態度題。通篇文章都是立足于銀行對“standard-setters”的敵意行為，因此表明了其對“standard-setters”的同情。

重磅推薦

2010年考研答案試題

考后第一時間：2010年考研答案試題解析專題

·視頻：2010年1月考研試題答案名師點評匯總

·2010考研查分、復試分數線、調劑信息發布預告

·2010年1月9日考研試題答案交流專區

·2010年考研模擬考場 考后第一時間提供在線估分

·2010年考研成績查詢、調劑信息短信提醒開通