第 1 頁:單項選擇題 |
第 4 頁:多項選擇題 |
第 5 頁:案例分析題 |
第 7 頁:答案及解析 |
三、案例分析題
1、
<1>、
【正確答案】 買賣合同成立。(1分)根據《合同法》的規定,采用合同書形式訂立合同,在簽字或者蓋章之前,當事人一方已經履行主要義務,對方接受的,該合同成立。在本題中,雖然甲乙雙方沒有在合同書上簽字蓋章,但華洋公司已將70臺精密儀器交付了雪祥公司,雪祥公司也接受并付款,所以合同成立。(2分)(2014年教材P69)
<2>、
【正確答案】 華洋公司的行為不合法。(1分)根據《合同法》的規定,應當先履行債務的當事人,有確切證據證明對方有轉移財產、逃避債務的情形,可以中止履行合同。本案例中,華洋公司僅僅是聽說雪祥公司有逃避債務的情形,而沒有“確切證據”證明,此時不能行使不安抗辯權。(1分)(2014年教材P74)
<3>、
【正確答案】 華洋公司與貿易公司簽訂的合同有效。(1分)出賣人就同一標的物訂立多重買賣合同,合同均不具有合同法規定的無效情形的,即認為買賣合同均有效。(1分)(2014年教材P91)
<4>、
【正確答案】 雪祥公司不得要求貿易公司返還該批貨物。(1分)根據《買賣合同解釋》的規定,在買賣合同均有效的情況下,買受人均要求實際履行合同的,先行受領交付的買受人請求確認所有權已經轉移的,人民法院應予支持。本題中,由于華洋公司已經將30臺精密儀器交付了貿易公司,貿易公司可以請求確認所有權,雪祥公司不能要求貿易公司返還。(2分)(2014年教材P91)
<5>、
【正確答案】 雪祥公司可以要求華洋公司承擔違約責任。(1分)根據規定,主張不安抗辯權的當事人如果沒有確切證據證明中止履行的,應當承擔違約責任。本案例中,華洋公司不正當的行使不安抗辯權和簽訂多重買賣合同,致使與雪祥公司簽訂的合同無法履行,應當向雪祥公司承擔違約責任。(1分)(2014年教材P74)
2、
<1>、
【正確答案】 ①董事會出席人數符合規定。(0.5分)根據規定,董事會會議應有過半數的董事出席方可舉行,本題親自出席會議的董事有6名,符合規定。(0.5分)(2014年教材P157)
②張某不能接受委托代為行使表決權。(0.5分)根據規定,董事因故不能出席董事會會議的,可以書面委托其他董事代為出席。而張某為本公司的監事,不是董事,不能代為行使表決權。(0.5分)(2014年教材P157)
①The number of the directors attending the meeting complies with the requirements of the law. According to the stipulations, a meeting of the board of directors may not be held unless more than half of the directors attend such meeting. In this case, there are six directors to attend the meeting, so it meets the requirements of the law.
②Mr. Zhang cant be entrusted to exercise the right to vote. According to the regulations, if a director cannot attend the meeting for some reasons, he may issue a written authorization to entrust another director to attend such meeting on his behalf. But Mr. Zhang is a supervisor, not a director, so he cant be entrusted to exercise the voting right.
<2>、
【正確答案】 會議通過了A上市公司的子公司B為董事高某提供借款10萬元的決定不符合規定。(1分)根據規定,公司不得直接或者通過子公司向董事、監事、高級管理人員提供借款,因此,本題中,A上市公司通過自己的子公司為董事提供借款的決定是違法的。(1分)(2014年教材P140)
The decision made at the meet that Subsidiary B of Listed Company A lends CNY100000 to Mr. Gao, a director, doesnt comply with the requirements of the law. According to the stipulations, the company must not lend money to its directors, supervisors or senior officers directly, or through its subsidiaries.
<3>、
【正確答案】 董事會通過了一項與B公司簽訂房屋租賃合同的決定是合法的。(0.5分)根據規定,上市公司董事與董事會會議決議事項所涉及的企業有關聯關系的,該董事會會議由過半數的無關聯關系董事出席即可舉行,本題出席董事會的董事中,有5名是無關聯董事,是符合規定的。另外,董事會會議所作決議須經無關聯關系董事過半數通過,本題5名董事全部通過,是可以通過該決議的。(1分)(2014年教材P159)
The decision made by Board of Directors to enter into a house-leasing contract with Company B complies with the requirements of relevant laws. As per the stipulation, if the director of a listed company is affiliated with the enterprise involved in the matters discussed by the board of directors, the meeting of the board of directors may be held once more than half of the unaffiliated directors will be present..In this case, among the directors attending the meeting, 5 are not related party and this is in line with the stipulation. Further, the resolution made by the Board of Directors should be passed by half of directors who are not related parties. In this case, as all 5 directors have voted for consent, the resolution can be passed.
<4>、
【正確答案】 董事會會議記錄存在如下的不當之處。(0.5分)根據規定,董事會會議記錄,應由出席會議的董事在會議記錄上簽名。因此,列席董事會會議的監事無須在會議記錄上簽名,而該公司列席董事會會議的監事在會議記錄上簽名,是不符合規定的。(1分)(2014年教材P157)
There exist some improper places in the minutes of Board of Directors meeting. As per the stipulations, the said minute should be signed by all the directors attending the meeting. So, it is not necessary for the supervisor sitting in on the meeting to sign on the minute. In this case, however, it is not in line with the regulations for the supervisor sitting in on the meeting to sign on the minutes.
<5>、
【正確答案】 A公司與C公司、D公司達成的協議屬于橫向壟斷協議中的固定商品價格的協議。該類協議被我國《反壟斷法》所禁止。(1分)(2014年教材P435)
The agreement concluded by Company A and Company C and D belongs to the fixing goods prices agreement under the horizontal agreement. Such type of agreement is prohibited by Chinese Anti-monopoly Law.
<6>、
【正確答案】 A公司與下游經銷商達成的協議屬于縱向壟斷協議中的限定向第三人轉售商品的最低價格的協議。該類協議被我國《反壟斷法》所禁止。(1分)(2014年教材P439)
The agreement concluded by the downstream distributors and Company A belongs to restricting the lowest price for resale under vertical monopoly agreement. Such agreement is prohibited by the Chinese Anti-monopoly Law.
<7>、
【正確答案】 作為多個經營者,A公司與E公司共同具有乙地的市場支配地位。(1分)根據規定,兩個經營者在相關市場的市場份額合計達到2/3的,即可推定為具有市場支配地位。本題中,A公司與E公司在乙地的市場份額達到了80%,超過了2/3的標準,因此可以推定為A公司和E公司共同具有乙地的市場支配地位。(1分)(2014年教材P444)
Company A and Company E have a dominant position. As per the stipulations, the joint relevant market share of two undertakings accounts for 2/3 or above can be assumed to be have a dominant market position. In this case, the joint relevant market share of Company A and Company E in Area Yi accounts for 80%, exceeding the upper limit 2/3, so it can be assumed that Company A and E have a dominant position.
<8>、
【正確答案】 ①A公司并購E公司屬于反壟斷法中規定的“經營者集中”。(0.5分)根據規定,經營者集中的情形包括經營者通過取得股權或者資產的方式取得對其他經營者的控制權。本題中,A公司并購E公司60%的股份,足以達到控制的要求,因此屬于反壟斷法中所規定的“經營者集中”。(0.5分)(2014年教材P447)
②A公司并購E公司之前應向國務院商務主管部門申報。(0.5分)根據規定,參與集中的所有經營者上一會計年度在中國境內的營業額合計超過20億元人民幣,并且其中至少兩個經營者上一會計年度在中國境內的營業額均超過4億元人民幣的,需要向國務院商務主管部門申報。本題中,A公司和E公司在境內的營業額總額為21億元人民幣,超過了20億元人民幣;A公司和E公司各自的營業額也均超過了4億元,因此需要在并購前申報。(0.5分)(2014年教材P449)
As per the stipulation, one situation of a concentration refers to: acquisition by undertakings, whether by purchase of securities or assets, of control of other undertakings. In this case, Company A acquired 60% of Company Es equities, enough to exert control, so it is a concentration.
②Before Company A acquires Company B, such acquisition must be notified in advance with the antimonopoly execution authorities of State Council. Under the condition that the turnover in Chinese territory in the proceeding accounting year of the undertakings concerned exceeds CNY2 billion and each of at least two parities has turnover in Chinese territory in the proceeding accounting year over CNY400 million, a report must be notified in advance with the antimonopoly execution authorities of State Council. In this case,(1)the turnovers of Company A and E in Chinese territory has exceeded CNY2.1 billion, above 2 billion;(2)each turnover has also exceeded CNY400 million, so such concentration falls under the notification criteria issued by the State Council, and a report must be notified in advance with the antimonopoly execution authorities.
【答案解析】
相關推薦: